Theology with Ricky Nazworth

 The interpretation of "Babylon" in the Book of Revelation has been a topic of theological debate for centuries. I tend to be mainly Futurist with a slight combination of other views such as Historicist. For sake of not confusing anything however, I will refer to my view as futurist. Within the Futurist view, there is a strong case for understanding Babylon not as a literal, rebuilt city in Iraq, but as a symbolic representation of another city or system—one that embodies the spiritual and moral corruption described in Revelation. This essay will explore and justify this symbolic interpretation using key verses from Revelation and the perspectives of prominent figures in church history. Scriptural Basis for the Symbolic Interpretation The Book of Revelation is rich in symbolism, and the depiction of Babylon is no exception. Several verses suggest that Babylon may represent something broader and more symbolic than a single, literal city. 1. Revelation 17:1-2: "Then one o...

 In a world full of different ideas and opinions, there are a few core beliefs that stand firm and unshakable. These are the Five Solas of the Protestant Reformation: Sola Scriptura, Sola Fide, Sola Gratia, Solus Christus, and Soli Deo Gloria. For me, these principles are not just important—they are absolute. While I believe in the importance of respecting different viewpoints and the idea of "agreeing to disagree" on many topics, the Five Solas are non-negotiable. They define what it means to truly follow Christ. Do note that this in not meant to justify the 5 Solas, just to explain what 5 Solae Supremacy is. Sola Scriptura: The Ultimate Authority of Scripture The first of the Solas, Sola Scriptura, means that the Bible alone is our ultimate authority in all matters of faith and practice. In today's world, where people often look to traditions, personal experiences, or modern interpretations for guidance, Sola Scriptura stands as a clear and firm declaration: the Bible i...

 The atonement of Jesus Christ is a central tenet of Christian theology, encompassing various theories that attempt to explain how Christ's death and resurrection bring salvation to humanity. Among these, Christus Victor and substitutionary atonement stand out as two of the most prominent models. While they offer different perspectives on the atonement, embracing both can provide a richer, more nuanced understanding of Christ's redemptive work. This essay argues that both Christus Victor and substitutionary atonement are necessary to fully grasp the multifaceted nature of the atonement, justifying each theory and exploring how they complement one another. Justifying Christus Victor Christus Victor emphasizes Christ's victory over the powers of sin, death, and the devil, portraying the atonement as a cosmic battle where Jesus triumphs over evil. This model has several compelling justifications: Biblical Basis : Christus Victor is deeply rooted in Scripture. Colossians 2:15 s...